| ABOUT MFO >> | |
HISTORY >> | |
MISSION >> | |
ORGANIZATION >> | |
ANNUAL REPORT >> |
The three Funds-Contributing States each contribute one third of the MFO's annual budget, less donations and any other external contributions which may be received. The directly interested Parties, Egypt and Israel, fund most of the costs of the MFO. Current Donor States are Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and Switzerland, who together contributed 7% of the MFO's FY2009 revenue.
›› RECENT DONOR EFFORTS›› NEW MISSION COSTS
The MFO was able to meet the initial start-up costs of the Border Guard Force mission, given to the MFO in 2005, thanks to generous supplementary support provided by the U.S. and Dutch Governments in FYs 2006-2007. On-going costs related to the new mission are being absorbed within the MFO budget with no permanent change in personnel levels. This reflects a longstanding MFO management policy to control costs and where possible find ways to offset inflation.
Inflation
›› INFLATION
Though the MFO's application of a commercial "bottom line" approach to peacekeeping has met with exceptional results, the bane of the annual budget remains inflation. The MFO experiences both foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations against its operating currency the U.S. dollar, inflation in all areas of its financial operations and climbing oil prices. Inflation alone continues to add over two million dollars a year to MFO expenses.
›› THE MFO BUDGET PROCESS
The MFO's budgeting philosophy and the financial techniques it uses are commercially oriented and comparable to the private sector. The MFO's financial operations are based on an integrated budgeting and funding procedure, designed to meet the particular needs of the organization. The MFO's financial reporting and accounting procedures follow United States generally accepted accounting principles, supplemented by MFO-specific conventions set forth in notes to the financial statements. The annual financial statements are audited by one of the major international auditing firms. Financial integrity is assured through a comprehensive program of internal controls subject to regular, external review. Financial results of each fiscal year are presented to the Funds-Contributing States at the annual Trilateral Meeting.
Each Spring, the MFO prepares and submits to the Funds-Contributing States for their approval an initial budget amount for the next FY, commencing 1 October. At the beginning of each FY, the three Funds-Contributing States provide the MFO with a letter of credit or equivalent commitments to cover the year's contributions. There is an implicit undertaking by the MFO to withdraw monies against these letters of credit only on a monthly basis and only in amounts needed to meet short term cash requirements. The MFO identifies and forecasts its near term (30 to 45 day) requirements, limits funds withdrawals accordingly, and makes prompt payment to its creditors. Any funds authorized but not expended for the fiscal year are credited against the next fiscal year's contribution from the Fund-Contributing States, while any fiscal year deficit is met from the following year's revenue.
›› MEETING UNFORSEEN CONTINGENCIES
The organization must meet any significant unforeseen contingencies without reverting to the Funds Contributors for supplemental appropriations, an impracticable approach to emergency funding. A combination of commercial insurance tailored to the MFO's needs and situation, a complementary Self-Insurance Fund (SIF) for losses not commercially insured, and a Capital Asset Replacement Fund (CARF) assist in meeting contingencies while maintaining budget stability. Donor funds are essential in reducing the impact on the CARF of the increasing expense to replace our aging structures and equipment.
For current financial information please refer to our Document Library.


